Our LAISSEZ-PERJURY (Allow perjury) In-Justice System

[Be Positive]

Many attempt to explain the apparently asymmetric or preferential decisions of family court judges, personnel, or police by alleging gender bias or imagining some BIG SMOTHER who secretly controls the workings of an invisible Orwellian Ministry of Families - MINIFAM. Various individuals over time - and in many forums and venues - have attempted to make the case that bias exists and pointed out that their pleas, letters, phone calls, antics, protests, and emails have fallen on the deaf ears of indifferent political officials and judges or a co-opted and thus 'owned' media unwilling to even touch, let alone fairly examine, such claims.

Those who have been associated with family court issues for many years know that progress has been elusive and difficult. On receiving emails from various family court related groups and advocates, I find myself scouring their contents and then over-celebrating any small, positive changes. (And I am thankful for the efforts of so many like-minded but complete strangers.) But I am also aware that the rate of improvement and the rate at which months and years are passing me by are very different. And it has caused me to re-look at what has been obvious all along and to recall some of what I learned at a service academy - west of the Mississippi - and on the streets of the Bronx.

In warfare and policing, one rule of thumb is that any long term contest between two groups is unlikely to be decisively won unless the ratio is 3:1. A struggle between two relatively equal groups is likely to be both indecisive and long-term. With relatively equal numbers of men and women, the future of the struggle over 'gender bias' in the family court system is most likely to be as incrementally 'successful' as it has been in the past. Little will change if this struggle continues to be defined primarily along gender lines. In my opinion, gender is irrelevant to good parenting. Unfortunately, as an orienting and explanatory issue though, "gender's" effect is that it too easily misguides, disorients, and dissipates the energies of those committed to reforming the family court system. Gender does not really explain the bias that is perceived by many in the family court system. While it is true that gender may be correlated with the biased outcome, gender is not the ultimate cause. THOSE WHO BENEFIT THE MOST FROM GENDER WARS WANT GENDER AND NOT LAISSEZ-PERJURY TO BE THE FOCUS. TO FIGHT A GENDER WAR IS TO FORGE A BEACHHEAD ON THE WRONG ISLAND !!! Besides, I like to fraternize with the enemy!

How is it then that bias insinuates itself into the purportedly neutral and independent decisions of the court? That is the key question. If a judge were asked 'Why a decision went one way and not the other?' it is likely that the judge would reference the testimony or presented evidence of the favored party. In a judge's defense, there are reasons that could be listed. Unfortunately, as many of us are very aware, the testimony and evidence presented is often deceitful, incomplete, mocked-up, or fabricated - despite the oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but. The source of the judge's biased decisions - in many cases - is likely traceable to material misrepresentations and perjury. Reduce perjury by prosecuting and penalizing it - motivate the telling of the truth by punishing lies - and a significant portion of the bias - and thus the basis for asymmetric decisions - will vanish. Perjury polarizes litigation, radicalizes litigants, and presently it pays off big-time.

Anyone and all - including the esteemed members of the bench and bar - are very aware that the dirty little secret of America's justice system - as seen both in the Duke lacrosse case and Tulia, Texas (among thousands of others) - is that perjury is routine, regular, rampant, and unprosecuted. Is anyone really surprised that if a prosecutor can 'indict a ham sandwich' - that perjury in family court results in biased decisions?

Let's go forward today and focus on repairing our 'laissez-perjury' (LP) - allow perjury - justice system. Focusing on this issue changes the ratio from 1:1 on the basis of gender to 1000:1 on the basis of those against perjury to those who think 'laissez-perjury' is just fine. Publicly airing and hammering home this dirty little secret can change the entire nature of the struggle to reduce bias. Focusing on ‘laissez-perjury’ puts the bar, the bench, and every prosecutor on the defensive and in the publicly open position of condoning - and thus encouraging by their inaction - perjury. Laissez-perjury is intended to shame them and show the ‘hospital cut’ in the judge’s robe.

The takeaway task from this essay should be a resolution to call, email, or visit your local prosecutor's office and find out how to go about reporting any felony perjury. No report need actually be made - just ask how to do it. Call the presiding family court judge or the bar and ask the same question. Call your state attorney general or governor. Publicly ask them or any candidate this question: "Our courts regularly and routinely don't prosecute perjury and consequently perjury is ruining them and justice. What specifically are you going to do about our 'laissez-perjurer' justice system if you are elected to office?" AND DON'T STOP UNTIL THIS DE FACTO POLICY OF LAISSEZ-PERJURY ENDS. GET IN THE HABIT OF ROUTINELY USING THE TERM: LAISSEZ-PERJURY.

NOTE: Don't expect any answers when you contact them. They are afraid of it. Raising 'laissez-perjury' is taboo or mokita (something everyone knows not to talk about.) Be prepared for evasions and lots of “I don’t knows.” LAISSEZ-PERJURY is KRYPTONITE to MINIFAM’s judges. Want to make a judge apoplectic? Just mention the word ‘perjury’ on the court record – it is likely to be redacted or expunged. Perjury is the Achilles heel of the American justice system and all insiders know it and fear it being brought out into the open.

Where there is no truth, there is no justice. And where there is no justice, there can never be any real peace. It is time for us to step up and begin telling the courts and each other the truth. Lies enslave; the truth sets free.

 
http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,14.0.html
 
http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27.0.html
 

[Doggeddaddy]

I read your posting and just needed to add or ask something. Seems that the court system not only allows perjury but all the illegal actions they've done in my case are covered up. For instance in my case the child support system failed to follow the divorce courts order to set up and take the support payments from my checks sighting they didn't have to. Three years later my ex-wife filed in court stating I never payed any support, which I did and I was force to show proof after this long period. When I showed proof, my check stub receipts were disected and when two payments were made the court called one payment a gift even though it was at the cp's request. Modifications and cost of living adjustment were made 5 times after the court set the support over the next year. When it is put on court documents it mysteriously shows the requests are made every two years even though the first this came to court to establish the child support was 4 years before the first establishment of support. what I'm saying is the courts themselves are comitting perjury to hide illegal acts by the child support services.

[Be Positive]

Arbitrary and unchecked power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. But what is it that is corrupted absolutely? It is the the truth. Corrupt power fears the truth and can have no conversation with it.

Perjury, evidence destruction or withholding, back dating, misrepresentation, suborning of perjury, witness coaching, and fraud have become part of the routine workings of many members of the bar, bench, police, and public personnel in criminal, civil, and family courts. Most of these actions are felonies committed and intended solely to provide an official basis for the biased court decisions which result. Why are they not prosecuted? A brief answer.

Victims of the CRIMINAL offenses of homicide and robbery can sue villains in CIVIL court because there are CIVIL 'twin' statutes associated with wrongful death and theft. (This is what happened to OJ where the CRIMINAL prosecutor lost the CRIMINAL case.) Unlike homicide or robbery, felony perjury has NO civil twin statute and its victims have only one place to go. The prosecution of felony perjury is EFFECTIVELY and SOLELY the decision of local prosecutor. To my knowledge, NO prosecutor's office in the over 3,100 jurisdictions in the 50 states will even receive or hear any ALLEGATION of perjury committed in ANY court. (You can check this out yourself in your local office and let me know if you have any luck. Ask for stats and procedures and you will hit a dead end.) The reason for this is clear: perjury has become EMBEDDED IN and ESSENTIAL TO the workings of the justice system and many of those associated with it.

Those WITHIN the justice system engage in these behaviors because they are quite assured that they can get away with them - and if they were ever prosecuted - would most likely threaten to reveal the full extent of the corruption of many others and cause the prosecutor to back off. Why was the system soft on the Duke prosecutor? Most certainly it is because he knows of lots of other and even worse behaviors. Those WITHIN the system are accountable only to themselves and they are the new UNTOUCHABLES. They have the goods on each other.

Who really thinks the Duke prosecutor decided to engage in the CRIMINAL behavior that he did, for this very FIRST time? He ran these risks because he thought there was NO risk of getting caught. I don't believe Nifong did anything he probably had not done successfully many times before and gotten away with.

As you know from your experience, who is it that perjury (etc) empowers? Judges, court personnel, prosecutors, and lying litigants. They all are afraid that their de facto LAISSEZ-PERJURY policy will become a matter of public discussion and this is because it will force them to face the corruption WITHIN.

If we end the LAISSEZ-PERJURY policy, the bias of the courts and the gender wars that depend on its existence will be significantly reduced. This battle can be won if it is brought out in the open. After all, what judge or prosecutor will take the position that a little perjury is just fine with them?

I believe this issue is the KEY to reforming the FAMILY COURT SYSTEM. You can check it out for yourself. Just raise this issue to members of the bench or bar, ask your A/G or governor. Their evasions and unwillingness to even hear or respond should be seen as a sign that LAISSEZ-PERJURY is KRYPTONITE to them. They will not discuss it because they are afraid of it. Lies enslave - the truth sets free.

 
http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,14.0.html
 
http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27.0.html
 

[XXX]

I have been going through this process for a while now. Its like a play book for corruption. Divorce,CPS,DHS,Child support Enforcemet. All for federal funding with no legal oversight to keep them in check. Documents are forged,lost, non existent,obstructing justice,No due Process, No equal protection of the law,No evidentiary hearings. There is a clear discriminatory bias against fathers, Programs that say families when they are designed for women and children only, shelters for abused women not men, Perjury is just one element of various abuses that take place in each of these agencies. Judges are presumed to no the law and by knowing the law they are accomplices to the corruption taking place in this country and therefore could quite possibly fall under the FEderal RICO act. Judges constitently ignore their oaths and the US and State COnstitutions. WHen a women knows that she can manipulate the system and she knows there is no consequences for her action why wouldnt she employ a corrupt system.

[Be Positive]

XXX - Welcome to the consequences of our de facto LAISSEZ-PERJURY policy. The abuses, practices, loss of rights, inequities, and unfairness DEPEND on perjury, evidence tampering or destruction, back-dating, fabrication, and fraud being WINKED AT by judges, prosecutors, the bar, legislators, attorneys general, governors at both the state and federal level. The reason that LAISSEZ-PERJURY can't be talked about openly, in court, and on the record is because THEN there would be an official record that OFFICIALS actually knew about the rampant perjury taking place. The word 'PERJURY' cannot be spoken (and if it is - count on it being deleted from the official recording.)

The GAME being played here - is that NOBODY officially knows about the RAMPANT, ROUTINE, and REGULAR PERJURY and MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION that is taking place. Think of it as a "DON'T KNOW, CAN'T SAY" strategy. OFFICIALLY, they can deny ever knowing of these abuses and therefore cannot be held accountable. (It is kind of like the Clinton administration NOT KNOWING about the genocide in RWANDA. They claim they didn't know and THEREFORE that makes them INNOCENT and BLAMELESS.) THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IS ITS BIGGEST LIE.

The KEY here is to hammer home the TAR TERM - LAISSEZ-PERJURY - and to make it stick to the justice system and those in it. SHAME them by telling the truth and exposing them. Allegations of bias - sound to most who hear them like whining - and bias is NOT a CRIMINAL offense. Large numbers of people don't give a rats about bias. And it is difficult to prove. PERJURY is a FELONY. It is an issue everyone can understand. IT IS TIME TO CALL THEM ON IT.

LIES ENSLAVE - THE TRUTH SETS FREE.

http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,14.0.html
 
http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27.0.html
 

[Rock]

This makes a lot of sense, can you give me some more information on this or direct me to a web site

Thanks

[JON LEMASTERS]

Yes,

  Once there is a Support Order, you can't give any money to the CP at all.  The State will not count that, even though you paid it and have a receipt.  You will certainly pay that amount twice.

Best regards,

Jon

[Be Positive]

Rock -  In the absence of specific questions I will be somewhat general here and tell you that I am planning to release a book in the next few months on this topic and my lengthy experiences with the family court system. In that book, LAISSEZ-PERJURY will be shown to be the ideal environment necessary for making what is known as a DIRTY DIVORCE work. (I believe I dodged what is known as a 'SILVER BULLET' nearly 5 years ago - that is a staged fight by my X wherein I was supposed to be arrested.)

    My experiences with what I call MINIFAM or Ministry of Families (a knock-off of Orwell's 1984 Minitrue, Minipax, Miniplenty, and Miniluv) are not unsimilar to some of the comments above in this thread as far as perjury, evidence, fabrication, misrepresentation, etc go. Most individuals with limited court backgrounds, on experiencing these 'surprises,' believe them to be exceptions, anomalies, random mistakes, etc. and lack any evidence to ever impeach or expose them after they occur. Fortunately, as a result of my suspicions being aroused by the SILVER BULLET incident above, I began to secretly record conversations with X in the year between its occurrence and when we actually went to trial in 2003. (Secret recordings were legal in my state of residence at that time.) So basically, I had suspicions of a DIRTY DIVORCE being planned and crafted and the recordings (and other things) gave me proof. (Transcripts of those recordings will be compared to trial testimony in the book or books I am writing - they are startling but very much the natural and logical expectations of the LAISSEZ-PERJURY policy.)

   I soon learned that my local prosecutor and the trial judge were unwilling (actually the judge was quite hostile) to even being approached with such information. As I asked for assistance and information about making a felony perjury allegation, LAISSEZ-PERJURY - a policy of inaction and ignorance - jumped out at me and served to explain not only my experience but also the experiences of many other individuals. As a result, I started to reframe my own history of administrative accidents, lost evidence, etc not as RANDOM or CHANCE events but as SYSTEMATIC administrative cover and camouflage needed to make LAISSEZ-PERJURY work.

   My logic goes this way. And I have developed the acronyms: ZAPP, SPIKE, and SLAP to describe and explain what actually happens. As far as I can tell, there are capital Zero, 0, perjury prosecutions - nationwide - that are initiated as a result of a litigant's trial complaints in any state. (There are what I call 'catch-all' perjury convictions which are appended to many other criminal charges by prosecutors to assure that the baddie goes to jail for certain. And I am uninterested in these prosecutor initiated ones.) Now when 0 is the result in 50 states one can only conclude it is NOT AN ACCIDENT but must be a conscious policy choice. I refer to this as ZAPP: Zero-out All Perjury Prosecutions.

   In order achieve ZAPP, it is necessary that no prosecutor or judge ever actually be OFFICIALLY known to have any knowledge of perjury allegations or to have in their possession evidence of such that they did not act on. If they did, then they would be in the politically or judicially untenable media position of being known to CONDONE perjury. If they were known to have such evidence or allegations and NOT have acted on them, their claim of 'THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM' would be seen as the GREAT LIE we know it is. As ORWELL said in 1984, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH - and it protects the judges and prosecutors from being seen to know. IGNORANT they are INNOCENT. The ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS EVIDENCE OF IGNORANCE and INNOCENCE. How is this achieved? It can only be achieved by SPIKE: Suppress Perjury Information, Knowledge, and Evidence. Part of SPIKE are some of the administrative accidents that occur or the odd manipulation of rules of evidence or the judge simply ignoring statements, exhibits, etc in the actual trial. Prosecutors have an easier job - calls to their office on the topic of perjury allegations are dead-ended, "I don't know-ed," and never meaningfully handled. (Again not an accident but simply part of SPIKE.) SPIKE is a necessity to achieve ZAPP and it results in there never being any official record or paperwork that a litigant might be able to present that shows actual KNOWLEDGE of PERJURY by all the key players. (It is really just a cheap trick wherein very highly educated and experienced judges and attorneys PRETEND they DON'T KNOW.)

   Of course, litigants who have evidence or proof of perjury may persist in trying to get the court to address or know what they have. And in such a situation, judges cannot come out and say DIRECTLY something like "I'm not going to look or listen to your evidence or allegations of perjury." (For the reasons above in SPIKE.) So how does a judge get a motivated victim of felony perjury litigant to back off - without actually talking about the topic of PERJURY? Simple PAVLOVIAN CONDITIONING. The judge sends a META-MESSAGE with the sub-text of "BACK OFF and DROP THIS ISSUE!"  The judge uses SLAP: Stop Litigants from Alleging Perjury. SLAP uses all of the administrative options available to the court: count on support payment review, submittal of tax records, arrearage awards out of nowhere, pay statement reviews, affidavits, additional inconveniently scheduled hearings, mandatory conflict training that interferes with work schedules, less custody, pay spouses attorney's fees, pay for ad litem guardian, etc. The message the judge sends by these administrative tactics (and essentially fines) is intended to motivate complete compliance and submittal to the judge's wishes. Litigants are adminstratively and financially abused to the point where the hassle, pain-in-the-neck, non-resposiveness, and COST in $$$$$ causes them to STOP MAKING PERJURY ALLEGATIONS and to give up. The goal is delay and justice delayed is intentionally justice denied. Bureaucracies (and KRYTOCRACIES - rule by judges) have their own virtual equivalents of DEATH BY A THOUSAND CUTS.

   ZAPP, SPIKE, and SLAP are key elements to making LAISSEZ-PERJURY work. As ZAPP exists in all jurisdictions, I would be interested in hearing from individuals who have had experience with SPIKE and SLAP above. Once ZAPP, SPIKE, and SLAP are understood - the logic behind all the accidents and oddities that once seemed random events is easily seen. ZAPP, SPIKE, and SLAP are essential to LAISSEZ-PERJURY. It all makes sick sense that IMO is alien to the principles of the rule of law, the Bill of Rights, and the oaths of office of those on the bench and in the bar.

The lies of the past enslave - truth will free the future.

Be Positive

 
http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,14.0.html
 
http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27.0.html