ANCPR


  Alliance for Non-Custodial Parents Rights

HOME |  DOWNLOAD HANDBOOK  |  LATEST HEADLINES  |  DISCUSSION FORUM  |  MEMBERS ONLY AREA
Perjury (*Laissez Perjurer*)
ANCPR - Fathers Rights - Custody - Child Support - Forum
August 21, 2008, 05:41:08 pm GMT+5 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Hello!! If you aren't already, please either log in or register to post or comment. Your participation and your opinions are most welcome here!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Perjury (*Laissez Perjurer*)  (Read 525 times)
JEI
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 102

wife of NCP, 2 stepsons and 8mo son


View Profile
« on: July 02, 2008, 04:14:16 pm GMT+5 »

   I have recently discovered through my endless online reseraching of Family Law that perjury is a HUGE problem that is ignored by the courts. This problem is referred to as "Laissez Perjurer", a user on this forum describes it in great detail if you want to read his info just search for the term.
   We are going to court tomorrow morning and the perjury by the opposing party WILL be clearly stated to the judge. If this goes unacknowledged I will know this "Laissez Perjurer" is a real thing not a conspiracy!!
   I know perjury happens daily in every court so why is there nothing done about it??? I have had many legal people confirm this problem to me and said that they have never seen anything done about it EVER. WTF? So my husband's ex can continue to LIE outright in court and get caught and she will not be punished?? I want to talk to like the news stations or something about this because WHOA> are we serious? is this the judicial system in the USA- we only enforce the rules the courts choose to enforce for their own reasons?
   If tomorrow goes badly as i suspect, i am going out kicking and screaming on the 6 o clock news damnit, lol, holding a huge sign that says "LAISSEZ PERJURER"!!!!!
Logged
Be Positive
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 24


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2008, 10:47:35 am GMT+5 »

FOR MORE INFORMATION ON LAISSEZ-PERJURER ("Allow Perjury") Click on these ANCPR site links below:

http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,7.msg13.html

http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,14.msg45.html

http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27.0.html
]
« Last Edit: July 13, 2008, 10:50:38 am GMT+5 by Be Positive » Logged

I am not an attorney. All information is an expression of my opinion only.
Gabrielle
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 20


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2008, 09:56:45 pm GMT+5 »

You are correct, it is very real and it is very common in the Florida family courts.
My husband's ex lied and perjured so many time and NOTHING was done. Worse, 2 extremely biased Judges actually agreed with her- even though everything she (and the 2 Judges) did and said was in direct refusal to obey the laws.

Every single thing that my husband filed with the court, had copies of the exact laws attached to it. Yet, even though the Judge had no excuse, the Judges refused to obey and enforce the laws. Worse, we discovered that his ex had perjured herself in another CS case, a second divorce case and a bankruptcy case. She had also committed public housing fraud. All of the absolute proof of her lies were turned over to the approriate authorities, again, NOTHING was done. Why? We truly believe it was because she is a CP mother AND a police officer!

One Judge issued a 10 page order, EVERYTHING that he wrote was verbatim that ex had written to the Judge- faxed at the last minute to the Judge's office (from the police dept where she works) and, as usual, she did not serve my husband with a copy, nor did her or judge say one dam thing about it during the hearing. We always found out about these last minute ex-parte letters AFTER the hearings. To show how this Judge did- in his order the Judge wrote that "the parties were divorced in 1989"- ex always wrote 1989, however, the divorce decree clearly stated 1988. Judge wrote that "the defendant has been found in contempt on more than one occasion"- ex wrote that he had been in contempt many times- the file proves that he was found in contempt only once and only one motion for contempt had been filed Further, the payment record proves that once he was found in contempt he paid every single week for over 3 years. Judge wrote that "defendant has not paid CS for many years"- ex wrote that he never pays his support- the payment record proves that he had been paying evey week for over 3 years. It doesn't take a lawyer or rocket scientist to see that the Judge paid attention only to the ex's writings and not the actual legal documents in the file (motions, petitions and rsulting orders plus the payment record).

We did not file a complaint with the JQC about the Judges, nor did we report her lies and frauds to the authority that oversees police officers, strictly out of fear of reprisals in court from the biased Judges. My husband has been paying off CS arrears, soon they will be paid and then- and only then will it be safe to file reports on those that refused to obey the laws.

Please let us know how the hearing goes tommorrow.

Oh, does your county record hearings, by audio or a court reporter? Our county doesn't and it's not required by law, that's one of the reasons that the Judges get away with ignoring the laws.

Logged
JEI
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 102

wife of NCP, 2 stepsons and 8mo son


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2008, 08:26:34 am GMT+5 »

Ugggh sounds like you are going to have to file an appeal to the appelate courts about how your case has been handled.
  FILE THOSE COMPLIANTS! Document each thing with dates and names, there is definetly preferrential treatment going on for the ex b/c shes a cop. They are trying to screw you over as it is so what will it hurt to report them and make them see you mean business.
    We go to court Wed. and still havent recieved the docs needed to fill out CS guidelines worksheet to find the real amount of CS. I filed and mailed a letter requesting the ex be held in contempt for noncompliance with the Motion to compel which ordered her to give us these docs w/in 48 hours of 7/3. 
  Just got a phone call this morning from the DOR's liason letting me know that unfortunatly she mailed out the docs to them on friday and THEY havent even gotten them yet, and that 'sorry' you wont be getting these docs that she is bringing to court w/in the 72 hours as required by law. GRRRREAT. Sneaky bitch, she always does this, she waits till the very last second to save her ass.
  We will of course object to not getting to see this stuff before court, but we will see. The judge may want to just end this and push it through.
  As for the transcripts of the hearings, I just ran thourgh all that downtown last week. They have made it almost impossible to get it written out BUT you can order the CD of the audio IF they happen to have recorded it. Appearently to save money they dont record most civil cases. But luckily our recent hearing was recorded and I did buy the CD for $15, so now i have to hire a legal transcriptionist to write it out. I dont even know how much thats going to be yet.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC | Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!