ANCPR


  Alliance for Non-Custodial Parents Rights

HOME |  DOWNLOAD HANDBOOK  |  LATEST HEADLINES  |  DISCUSSION FORUM  |  MEMBERS ONLY AREA
The LAISSEZ-PERJURY Test or How to have FUN with the TRUTH
ANCPR - Fathers Rights - Custody - Child Support - Forum
December 01, 2008, 01:07:56 pm GMT+5 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you have questions, the ANCPR Winning Strategies Handbook has the answers!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The LAISSEZ-PERJURY Test or How to have FUN with the TRUTH  (Read 3765 times)
Be Positive
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 22


View Profile
« on: October 04, 2007, 11:20:08 am GMT+5 »

   Have you ever been in a position of having DISCOVERED the TRUTH (without the LIAR KNOWING) and then used that knowledge to TOY with the LIAR? It can be FUN watching them squirm while turning the tables on them. The point of this TOPIC or THREAD is to gather information about SEPARATE FORUM MEMBER jurisdictions while having some FUN doing so. It is useful to read my other topic on this site: "Our LAISSEZ-PERJURY (Allow Perjury) In-Justice System" before proceeding further with this one.

   LAISSEZ-PERJURY (abbreviated 'LP') theory states that both judges and prosecutors cannot be seen to KNOW of Perjury Allegations and thus by a variety of tactics, tricks, and leger-de-law AVOID anything which shows they actually know. IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH (a' la Orwell.) The focus of this THREAD is on PROSECUTOR's offices (and based on my own experience.) Some basics first.

   Perjury is a criminal act and in all 50 states and their 3100 jurisdictions prosecutable as a criminal felony. This is the job of the local prosecutor's office. Most prosecutor's offices have official (taxpayer funded) BRAGSITES where the community can visit and catch up on the latest ('Re-elect me again') news. On these BRAGSITES, there are a variety of links to all sorts of crimes and offenses that show how truly POLITICALLY-CORRECT (or sensitive) the PROSECUTOR is. One can find nearly everything: Identity Theft, Domestic Violence, Loud Noises, Graffiti, Drug Abuse, Drunk Driving, Homicide, Fraud, Robbery, Rape, Child Abuse, Internet Predation, etceterayada. Associated with all of these are often full webpages, personal messages by the PROSECUTOR on the topic, downloadable forms and brochures, contact office phone numbers, linkouts to community assistance organizations and national organizations, news articles, statistics, trends, recent legislative and community initiatives, recent highly visible cases and sentencing, etc. It would be possible - though tedious - to compare offenses in the state's CRIMINAL CODE with the website offenses and find a ONE-to-ONE match (or a helpful phone number in the case of something missing.)

   THAT IS, with the SINGLE notable exception of FELONY PERJURY. (You can waste your time by using the BRAGSITE's SEARCH ENGINE to look up the KEYWORD 'PERJURY.' Most likely, what will be returned is a 'Thousands of Items Hit List' that points to all the signature blocks of all forms that contain the phrase 'under penalty of perjury.' Obviously, nothing as useful as the other BRAGSITE featured offenses above.)

   Who thinks this OVERSIGHT or OMISSION is an accident? Who thinks it is an ACCIDENT that the multi-million dollar justice system information systems 'missed' perjury? And in 3,100 "independent" jurisdictions? The success of the LP policy DEPENDS on PROSECUTOR INACTION on any FELONY PERJURY ever originating from a victim litigant's allegations. And a PROSECUTOR's reputation DEPENDS on NOT BEING OPENLY KNOWN to be CONDONING PERJURY. The reality of LP as a policy CANNOT be publicly and broadly known - or else the WHOLE justice system breaks down. After all, what sort of justice system can we have IF litigants can LIE BOLDLY and AGGRESSIVELY with impunity? If you were a juror - wouldn't LP by itself be an utterly sufficient basis for the 'BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'ing of the entire PROCEEDINGS? This question CANNOT be publicly ASKED or DISCUSSED because PROSECUTOR INACTION and INDIFFERENCE are simply NOT an ANSWER and are INDEFENSIBLE. Saying so publicly would be an act of political and career SEPPUKU (ritual samurai suicide) and a SHOCK to the COMMUNITY. "The integrity of the justice system" is its GREAT LIE. The truth of the reality of LP (and its entry as a TAR TERM in the NATIONAL DIALOG) is not a SMEAR.

NOW FOR THE FUN and RESEARCH RESULTS

   I NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE. I need you to provide examples from your own jurisdiction which will help to prove LP theory. IF LP theory is correct, you will find that as you contact the offices of prosecutors, judges, attorneys generals, governors, legislators, or members of the bar, NO ONE will be able to help you or provide you with ANY information that is useful. There is no need to make an allegation of perjury - when you call, just say that you are a concerned citizen INQUIRING about how FELONY PERJURY allegations are handled, the procedures for doing so, and the OFFICE to contact.  Ask if they could send you STATISTICS (there aren't any) or point you to the OFFICE that could give them to you. Ask for a form to FILL-OUT and what address and office to send it to. Don't be surprised if you hit go-nowhere, dead-ends and get a lot of "I dunno's" or "Well, I'm sorry I couldn't have been of [less] help to you's."

   Please report your experiences and the name of your county and state on this TOPIC.

Extra FUN

   Ask the above questions publicly to CANDIDATES or SPEAKERS and watch them do a version of what some Boomers might remember as 'DUCK & COVER.' If you ask any LP related questions, you will both understand what it is like to be a skunk at a picnic AND that nearly everyone knows about the reality of LP and wishes that it never be mentioned. Consider this as proof that ALL know about LP's truth - and this whole nation of free people with rights to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and to the rule of law are supposed by their SILENCE to CONSENT to LP's abuses and consequences.

Extra, Extra FUN

   Many court systems, local bars, and prosecutor's offices have SPEAKER's BUREAUs that serve to sustain and to make the propaganda and the GREAT LIE of 'the INTEGRITY of the JUSTICE SYSTEM' more credible. These are part of COMMUNITY OUTREACH programs (and many are genuinely useful.) Ask for a JUDGE or PROSECUTOR to come and speak on the subject of "How the INTEGRITY of the JUSTICE system is assured by perjury prosecution." Don't be surprised if no one volunteers. After all, what would they say? Surely not this truth - "We know perjury is rampant, routine, regular, and results in a miscarriage of justice and because it doesn't affect our personal lives, we have decided to look the other way." (Just think of what might happen to the seminars and conference and travel budgets, if some of those funds had to be diverted to enforce perjury statutes.) Pass me the sunscreen.

   Should anyone actually get a speaker on this topic, please send me a transcript or an MP3 recording.

Victory One Day

   Think of tar term, LAISSEZ-PERJURY, as a version of the "Butterfly effect." The phrase alone sums up and describes the entire problem as it enters the language and conversation. It will be whispered and spoken of at an increasing rate. It defines the problem (and points to its solution.) It is contagious and in time a pandemic of public awareness will result. Hearing it will cause JUDGES and PROSECUTORS to suddenly simulate that their cell-phones rang. There is an inexorability here (and most assuredly MINIFAM in the interim will perceive me as guilty of the most heinous of thoughtcrimes.)

The truth sets us free. We need only be willing and courageous enough to speak it.

TO THE BRAVE, BELONG ALL THINGS!

Be Positive


http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,7.0.html

http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27.0.html
« Last Edit: August 31, 2008, 10:54:03 am GMT+5 by Be Positive » Logged

I am not an attorney. All information is an expression of my opinion only.
Be Positive
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 22


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2007, 12:04:01 pm GMT+5 »

This list contains the states in alphabetical order. If your city is NOT listed here, then the status as regards being a LAISSEZ-PERJURER jurisdiction is unknown. Please follow the instructions in TOPIC above and reply below listing your city, state, and experiences in attempting to find out how to report, make, and/or prosecute FELONY PERJURY allegations. I will update this list periodically.

I sincerely thank you for your support and assistance. The truth will set us free and shame those who thought that LAISSEZ-PERJURER was something not worthy of public debate. IMHO, the covert and willful unenforcement of PERJURY statutes is effectively the EXECUTIVE branch's de facto VETO, ABROGATION, and NULLIFICATION of a duly enacted law intended to protect the constitutional and civil rights of the citizenry. All of the chatter about due process, equal protection, rights to a fair trial, the equitable administration of justice MATTERS for NOTHING in a justice system where LAISSEZ-PERJURER is the uber-rule that rules the rule of law.

Judges, prosecutors, the entire bar, many legislators, attorneys general and governors all know the truth of the reality of LAISSEZ-PERJURER. The policy of LAISSEZ-PERJURER ought to be recognized for what it is - simply the GREATEST BETRAYAL of the American people and the rule of law by those who studied with Professor Kingsfield and willing offered up their mush brains and integrity so that they could leave his classes having 'learned to think like a lawyer.'

IF MEMBERS OF THE BENCH AND THE BAR - GIVEN THEIR OATHS AS OFFICERS OF THE COURT - CAN REASON THEMSELVES INTO LAISSEZ-PERJURER, THEN IT IS TIME TO END THE PRIVILEGE OF SELF-GOVERNANCE and SELF-OVERSIGHT. Just as war is too important to be left to the GENERALS, the UBER-RULE of the JUSTICE SYSTEM is TOO IMPORTANT TO BE LEFT SOLELY TO JUDGES and ATTORNEYS. Even us MUSH BRAINS can understand the self-evident FRAUD that LAISSEZ-PERJURER is. It is time for OUTSIDE INDEPENDENT and ADULT SUPERVISION. NO GROUP SHOULD EVER AGAIN GET TO BE THE JUDGE OF ITS OWN CAUSE. The covert implementation of LAISSEZ-PERJURER shown here is proof enough.

What sort of justice system would we have where LAISSEZ-PERJURER is the UBER-RULE? Exactly the defective and broken one we now have. We have a KRYTOCRACY - not a REPUBLIC nor a DEMOCRACY. We, the people, and our duly elected representatives enacted perjury statutes - JUDGES and PROSECUTORS have CONSPIRED to SUBVERT THEM.

Look below and see if your city and jurisdiction and rights have been uber-ruled.

Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona - Phoenix
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Georgia
Florida
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Caroliina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
« Last Edit: October 04, 2007, 12:47:47 pm GMT+5 by Be Positive » Logged

I am not an attorney. All information is an expression of my opinion only.
Be Positive
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 22


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2007, 12:56:45 pm GMT+5 »

 
After my divorce trial, I talked with my attorney who basically told me that perjury isn't prosecuted. (See ZAPP.) I visited the county prosecutor's BRAGSITE and found lots of items that appealed to 'NAMED CLASSES' whose membership would be encouraged by what they saw on the BRAGSITE to re-elect him. One of the consequences of DEDICATED SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP legislation is that prosecutors will FEATURE articles, items, and all of the POLITICALLY CORRECT topics on their BRAGSITES and feature stories about how the prosecutor is busily tending to their needs. Obviously, being a member of the general public and a victim of alleged perjury - there are CAPITAL ZERO, O, points to be gained by having the "People's Defender" actually do anything for me.

The KEYWORD 'PERJURY' returned thousands of forms and documentation whose signature blocks contained the phrase 'under penalty of perjury.' DEATH BY 10 GAZILLION HITS. I emailed the prosecutor's office and asked GENERALLY about how to make an allegation of FELONY PERJURY. I received a response saying "The prosecutor's office cannot give out legal advice." A surprising response - I ask how to report a CRIMINAL FELONY - and the prosecutor's office emails me back and says they don't provide 'legal advice.' I wonder if I'd get the same response if I reported a homicide or child abuse. I next emailed the prosecutor's office and asked for STATISTICS about FELONY PERJURY prosecution. I received a '"Sorry, we don't have that information." Let's see. The prosecutor's BRAGSITE has all sorts of reports with graphs, plots, and charts of year over year rates on everything else - and they just missed FELONY PERJURY. Taxpayers have paid for a multi-million dollar justice system information system and there is a BIG HOLE where there should be - NOT A ZERO - but an actual INTEGER. LP theory leads me to think they simply don't want to show a CAPITAL ZERO.

I subsequently phoned into the prosecutor's office and talked to the usually very helpful office operator who was to help direct my call. "What is your issue, sir?" I want to find out how to file an allegation of felony perjury. "Sorry, sir. I don't know who would handle that," she said. I asked if I could talk to a supervisor to find out if the supervisor might know. I was told "My supervisor wouldn't know that answer either" !!!! I asked if it was possible if she could ask one of the attorneys in the prosecutor's office when she got a chance and I would call back and get an answer. "No, I can't do that," she said. Thus, there was NOWHERE to GO with my report of FELONY PERJURY. In essence, the prosecutor's office staff told me to 'talk to the hand.' Or to at least one of its digits. Clearly, the above show that my jurisdiction is a LAISSEZ-PERJURER jurisdiction.


http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,7.0.html

http://ancpr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27.0.html
« Last Edit: October 08, 2007, 08:01:48 pm GMT+5 by Be Positive » Logged

I am not an attorney. All information is an expression of my opinion only.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC | Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!