News: Fathers’ Rights, Child Support, Custody

2 responses so far ↓

• 1 Jim Deeny // Feb 2, 2007 at 7:29 am

  Amazing video! I can’t believe people just sit there and watch as the one guy gets his ass beat by 2-3 women, even the cops! Whoever put that video together really did a great job.

• 2 wdfields // Feb 13, 2007 at 11:11 am

  A parent of my knowledge has been having difficulty with various states (of the northwest) – (i) not being LDS, and (ii) being a father when not LDS.

  Go figure,

  The individual was formerly employed in a legal dept of a company of one of the states, which was 90% LDS. Well, the individual parent of an alternative faith, finally resigned that he would never be a “worthy brethren.” So, the loving parent, in anguish for the need to travel more remote from endearing related children, left to another destination as a divorced parent.

  But then the Dot.com disruption and the little 9-11 thingy, affected the loving parent . . . as facing yet another adjustment.

  Out on the streets again. The loving parent contemplated images within wondering why the government employees are not ever able to relate . . . .

  The loving parent further understood consequences of honoring a given faith of their own convictions.

  In other words, not only may the loving parent not be LDS, but the parent is also a white, heterosexual, American (politically incorrect) gender.

  In other words, the loving parent carries a huge, Huge, HUUGE bulls-eye marred across their backside for plunder.

  In sum, the loving parent now struggles with the previous ignorant condition and the emerging realization of the deplorable realities of our modern and progressive liberated “America.”

  Along this axiom, the loving parent borrows words from the film, “O’Brother Where Art Though” . . . and expresses “Damn, I’m in a tight spot.”

  Remarkably, the parent has been able to find the wherewithal to file an appeal before a court of their own region, which has been in process for about a year.

  But, remarkably, the day before which the hearing was to be held, the Judge takes a vacation.

  May it be that perhaps “entrusted” “feminist” are endeavoring to sustain their all knowing “enforcement” of a self-admitted invalid order of the neighboring state?

  Interestingly, this neighboring state happens to be under influence of the . . . you guessed it . . . LDS. . . . . Great, NOT.

  So, in the best interests of children, we (the word we is definitely in quotes here) allow kidnapping of the better interests of our children.

  Simply a brief glimpse of the loving parents perspective . . .

  Sadly, the money entrenching such awful influences is immense. Further, the corruption within various branches of government, industry, institutions and countries is similarly deeply embedded.

  So it is that the loving parent may stumble a bit in an uncertain state as to how to address the demise.

  Sadly, many a bystander stands in bleachers of the by be-gones in a form of self entertainment – pondering internal words of, hhm, what to we have here.

  Many an entrusted, as short as only 3-4 years ago, may have been utterly unaware of the bizarre influences masquerading under notions of “sugar and spice and everything nice” together with cloaking within the innocence of our endearing children.

  How might we anticipate our future “progress?” This certainly depends upon “we the people.”

  Unfortunately, the Federal Dole seems to placate many a complacent of “we the people.” Or wait a minute, is this “we” of the “people?”

  The number of agency contractors/institutions allegedly self-catering to/from this unfortunate industry via the “best interests of children,” have been able to too easily manipulate the Federal Faucet FBO of their own “worthy brethren,” shareholders and directors. Thus, the entrustments of public service have effectively been left to the self-serving demise of corporate (or should this recite as corporal, or carnal (3-c’s)) interests.

  It almost sounds too bizarre to be true.

  Accordingly, many a loving parent may have the feeling of staring into the belly of the beast.

  Presently, 500 billion annually falls under the management responsibility of a Mr. Micheal Levitt, “our” present director of the Federal Department of Health and Human Services. And before this “entrusted service,” acted as the three times former governor of Utah. Accordingly, this entrusted “servant” of the “worthy brethren” has first hand experience for serving an addiction of the States to the federal dole (clever avenues of augmenting financial budgets).

  And prior to this, direct experience with the financial insurance industry. . . . Hmmm, every child on the insurance rolls? I wonder why? for their own protective needs? . . . Free capitalism? . . . to Skew supply demand models of economic? . . . Good grief!

  So, one may be left with internal questions . . . is he . . . well, how do we express this in a politically correct frame of reference? (Well, once one has been openly dismissed (or shall we say . . . discriminated against as being Non-LDS)) one may simply come straight out as ask directly, did he attend BYU? Go on a “mission?” . . .

  And the answer is . . .

  Maybe not BYU, but . . . Yes, this line of thought may find traction.

  So may it be that this “entrusted” is perhaps under the mis-self-informed influence of THEE only “entitled” latter day Gods.

  And if so, god over whom?

  What may be the implications for others of us? Might such be a bit “alarming?”

  Certainly, alarming to the perspective of a loving father perhaps sensitive to the discriminatory knife of the “Politically Correct.”

  Presently, it has been expressed that a neighboring state is asking a more proximate state to . . . essentially, assist in extermination of the caring loving parent of three endearing children.

  In about 1999-2000, the loving parent found themselve ousted into the streets. Where upon yet another lover of the other parent was taken into the home of the parent and children, etc.

  Yes, yet another example of the more modern, progressive and liberated American Politically Correct Fairer Gender.

  Could this perhaps be emblematic of the Mores . . .

  From the movie “American Werewolf In London,” you may recall a scene where Jack and David leave the Slaughtered Lamb, a pup in the English country. As the young vacationing college friends exit the Slaughtered Lamb, new acquaintances within caution them to “beware of the Moors.” Jack and David leave the pup for crossing a bogy region of the English country. Beneath the full-moon over-head and within the mist across the land, one of the two – as suggested from the foreshadowing lent by title of the film – falls to a werewolf of London.

  So too, we of our own settings within American should pay caution to the “Mores”, in liking to the cationary note lent to Jack and David to beware of the “Moors.”

  Many within our influence, and perhaps of even ourselves of the limited human condition of ignorance, may be influenced by the Mores – i.e., More house, More money, More bling and, of course, more Amore. Consider for example, the recent sit-come “desperate housewives.” Of what are they desperate? Desires for a grander McMansion?

  So too, we can even find various States, each and every one, beating of a similar drum for the . . . more more more . . . of the Federal Dole.

  So within this message of lengthy editorial, in a spirit of free speach and brain-storming, we may simply consider a proposed premise reminiscent or in recognition of the human condition . . .

  . . . the Addiction to the Federal Dole . . .

  Behold, the Federal Dole,

  . . . Picking the pockets,

  . . . . . . Bleeding the hearts,

  . . . . . . . . . Of children,

  . . . . . . . . . . . . In the name of children.

  This is your State on the Federal Dole.

  Any questions?

  Just say NO! (to the federal Dole)

  Well, of course, one may discern of a willingness to express the un-expressible.

  And why not?

  The loving parent has already been threatened via one of the addicted States, the direct “threats to be located and criminally arrested.”

  Such threats were lent to the loving, yet idealisticaly niave, parent on two seperate occasions.

  One threat was delivered by phone from a State police of one of the states, following an inquirie of the parent to the state’s Governor’s office. Mind you, the loving parent had been acting upon their former suggestions to call-back if the parent had not yet heard back from them over the week previous.

  A second threat was delivered in writing and forwarded by interstate mail. The letter included a threat for criminal arrest and also of threats to livelihood — via inteferring conduct (threats of libels, slanders, . . . ) to two other States of the Northwest.

  At this point, it should be of no surprise to learn that the loving parent may have stumbled substantially and quite naively upon many a spring-loaded trap associated with the falsly-perceived-need of the addicted to endeavor for preservation of various interests or avenues for feeding upon (frenzied engorgement of the) 500 Billion dollar industry. Again, we need take note of or by whom such “purse” is managed.

  In whom do we trust?

  As some may appreciate from 30 years ago, many a loving parent of today would have likely been saluting the flag and reciting of/for God and Country.

  Today, maybe in God may we trust, as for . . .

  But, We can, shall and must keep hope alive.

  Just maybe, through free speech and open public debate, we may restore semblance of Liberty . . . preserve respect for the dignity of all individuals . . . even, heaven forbid, loving parents of endearing children.

  May we therefore encourage the respect of all individuals as though all may be as “Children” of the Almighty.

  - just an advocate for Accountable Dignified American Democracy with Integrity.

You must log in to post a comment.