<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The criminalization of parents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ancpr.com/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ancpr.com/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/</link>
	<description>Alliance for Non-Custodial Parents Rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:30:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: used plant machinery</title>
		<link>http://ancpr.com/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/#comment-6536</link>
		<dc:creator>used plant machinery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancpr.com/blog/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/#comment-6536</guid>
		<description>There might be few questions rising in your mind relating to machinery. The place I can purchase this equipment? The best way to get the most effective inexpensive prices? Find out how to verify the standard of the machinery? Sure, these questions are obvious and you will get the answers as properly in this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There might be few questions rising in your mind relating to machinery. The place I can purchase this equipment? The best way to get the most effective inexpensive prices? Find out how to verify the standard of the machinery? Sure, these questions are obvious and you will get the answers as properly in this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merck</title>
		<link>http://ancpr.com/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/#comment-6124</link>
		<dc:creator>Merck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancpr.com/blog/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/#comment-6124</guid>
		<description>People who home school their children are usually good parents who are completely disgusted with the school system. An article in the Augusta Chronicle about this law prompted the following comment from one of its readers …

---“25 Years ago, our child was seriously sick and needed to stay at home for a week to recover. I went to school and got her school work and brought it home. She did the entire weeks worth of school work in 2 1/2 hours. I asked her what the heck did she do with the rest of her time in school if it only took 2 1/2 hours to do the actual work. She replied, she was bored. We took her out of school and home schooled her. We traveled all over to include, Mexico, Japan, Canada and the USA. She home schooled from 5th grade to 10th grade without a &#039;required&#039; curriculum. While we lived in Japan she mainstreamed with the Japanese. For 10th - 12th we enrolled her in an International Home School for the curriculum. She did 10th, 11th and 12th grade in 9 months. Graduated with honors, went to college, and now owns her own business. The freedom to travel, to live abroad, was wonderful. Home schooling is a personal choice of the parents and their lifestyle”.   

I don’t blame these parents for wanting to school their own children. I think it shows a level of commitment to your children that few parents possess. 

Ultimately, it really doesn’t matter what any of us thinks about the issue of schooling one’s own children. The government has “absolutely no right” to tell people they can’t home school their kids.

It really doesn’t matter what any of us thinks about 50/50 custody after a divorce. The government has no right to deny either parent custody unless a crime has been committed against the child.

It really doesn’t matter if you think a man has the responsibility to father a child he didn’t want. As long as a female has the right to abort the child, or give it up for adoption, or simply abandon the child, then the father has to be afforded equal protection. 

That’s the “law of the land” and it really doesn’t matter what any of us thinks about it. People in government need to obey the law and keep their noses out of the publics’ business or eventually we will all pay the price.  

Kevin Merck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who home school their children are usually good parents who are completely disgusted with the school system. An article in the Augusta Chronicle about this law prompted the following comment from one of its readers …</p>
<p>&#8212;“25 Years ago, our child was seriously sick and needed to stay at home for a week to recover. I went to school and got her school work and brought it home. She did the entire weeks worth of school work in 2 1/2 hours. I asked her what the heck did she do with the rest of her time in school if it only took 2 1/2 hours to do the actual work. She replied, she was bored. We took her out of school and home schooled her. We traveled all over to include, Mexico, Japan, Canada and the USA. She home schooled from 5th grade to 10th grade without a &#8216;required&#8217; curriculum. While we lived in Japan she mainstreamed with the Japanese. For 10th &#8211; 12th we enrolled her in an International Home School for the curriculum. She did 10th, 11th and 12th grade in 9 months. Graduated with honors, went to college, and now owns her own business. The freedom to travel, to live abroad, was wonderful. Home schooling is a personal choice of the parents and their lifestyle”.   </p>
<p>I don’t blame these parents for wanting to school their own children. I think it shows a level of commitment to your children that few parents possess. </p>
<p>Ultimately, it really doesn’t matter what any of us thinks about the issue of schooling one’s own children. The government has “absolutely no right” to tell people they can’t home school their kids.</p>
<p>It really doesn’t matter what any of us thinks about 50/50 custody after a divorce. The government has no right to deny either parent custody unless a crime has been committed against the child.</p>
<p>It really doesn’t matter if you think a man has the responsibility to father a child he didn’t want. As long as a female has the right to abort the child, or give it up for adoption, or simply abandon the child, then the father has to be afforded equal protection. </p>
<p>That’s the “law of the land” and it really doesn’t matter what any of us thinks about it. People in government need to obey the law and keep their noses out of the publics’ business or eventually we will all pay the price.  </p>
<p>Kevin Merck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: repealbradley</title>
		<link>http://ancpr.com/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/#comment-6121</link>
		<dc:creator>repealbradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancpr.com/blog/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/#comment-6121</guid>
		<description>Excellent article. I am sorry to say that the Clintons have been a huge problem for American rights and freedom, for example in the area of child support. I am not against child support and most sane people are not. Unconstitutional law in another thing altogether. The federal Bradley Amendment for child support was a pet project of the feminists and the Clinton Administration and one of their biggest victories. It has not been a victory for the American people...
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAQH4va5sTo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Unconstitutional Child Support Law Video&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article. I am sorry to say that the Clintons have been a huge problem for American rights and freedom, for example in the area of child support. I am not against child support and most sane people are not. Unconstitutional law in another thing altogether. The federal Bradley Amendment for child support was a pet project of the feminists and the Clinton Administration and one of their biggest victories. It has not been a victory for the American people&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAQH4va5sTo" rel="nofollow">Unconstitutional Child Support Law Video</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://ancpr.com/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/#comment-6120</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancpr.com/blog/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/#comment-6120</guid>
		<description>The home school ruling is absurd. Kudos ot the governator who said plainly that he will write a law to allow home schooling. Sadly, he has not seen fit to perform the same public service by outlawing prejudice against Dads. 

Could it be that the feminist powerhouse jumped on the gov when home school affected women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The home school ruling is absurd. Kudos ot the governator who said plainly that he will write a law to allow home schooling. Sadly, he has not seen fit to perform the same public service by outlawing prejudice against Dads. </p>
<p>Could it be that the feminist powerhouse jumped on the gov when home school affected women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wanito</title>
		<link>http://ancpr.com/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/#comment-6119</link>
		<dc:creator>wanito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancpr.com/blog/2008/03/16/the-criminalization-of-parents/#comment-6119</guid>
		<description>This is not related to this article, but it seems that, instead of some lawyers who read my original press release that I placed on this site some weeks back concerning the constitutionality of a female president, taking the opportunity to represent me in this legal action, they have designated the legally valid constitutional issue that I raised their own, and are filing their own legal actions based on such. I have attempted to find local attoryneys to represent me in this legal action, but to use a common term here in New Mexico, I couldn&#039;t find any with the &quot;cojones&quot; or, to be non-discriminatory, the &quot;ovaries&quot; to take the case. Also, quite simply, I just don&#039;t have the kind of money or connections needed to get this done. However, I am still looking for an attorney to file the federal action for me. The publicity this attorney would get would be worth a thousand attoryney fees.  

If you want an example of the other people running with my issue, take a look at www.opednews.com and look for the article concerning Hillary Clinton and the Constitution. There&#039;s a Washington state attorney who is filing a federal legal action based on the issue I raised in my press release of Feb 5, 2008. From what the article says, others are attempting to do the same thing. Seems like the issue I raised has begun to take on a life of it&#039;s own.

John Alvarez</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not related to this article, but it seems that, instead of some lawyers who read my original press release that I placed on this site some weeks back concerning the constitutionality of a female president, taking the opportunity to represent me in this legal action, they have designated the legally valid constitutional issue that I raised their own, and are filing their own legal actions based on such. I have attempted to find local attoryneys to represent me in this legal action, but to use a common term here in New Mexico, I couldn&#8217;t find any with the &#8220;cojones&#8221; or, to be non-discriminatory, the &#8220;ovaries&#8221; to take the case. Also, quite simply, I just don&#8217;t have the kind of money or connections needed to get this done. However, I am still looking for an attorney to file the federal action for me. The publicity this attorney would get would be worth a thousand attoryney fees.  </p>
<p>If you want an example of the other people running with my issue, take a look at <a href="http://www.opednews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.opednews.com</a> and look for the article concerning Hillary Clinton and the Constitution. There&#8217;s a Washington state attorney who is filing a federal legal action based on the issue I raised in my press release of Feb 5, 2008. From what the article says, others are attempting to do the same thing. Seems like the issue I raised has begun to take on a life of it&#8217;s own.</p>
<p>John Alvarez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

