http://ancpr.com/2008/03/10/new-formula-has-bitter-taste-for-mums-newscomau/ Alliance for Non-Custodial Parents Rights Wed, 16 May 2012 22:30:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://ancpr.com/2008/03/10/new-formula-has-bitter-taste-for-mums-newscomau/#comment-6155 thomasr1025 Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:20:21 +0000 http://ancpr.com/blog/2008/03/10/new-formula-has-bitter-taste-for-mums-newscomau/#comment-6155 The child support laws shoul be changed. If the parent who has the custody has a lot of income, then the other parent should not be harassed for child support. Especially if the other parent is poor. This is exactly what is happening in my case. If you are interested in knowing more about my story, please visit my wbsite www.justiceisblind.info. I was thrown here in jail illegally for not signing consent on my daughter's passport application. I am planning to do a hunger strike in front of the U.S.Supreme Court. If any one want to join please contact me. The child support laws shoul be changed. If the parent who has the custody has a lot of income, then the other parent should not be harassed for child support. Especially if the other parent is poor. This is exactly what is happening in my case.
If you are interested in knowing more about my story, please visit my wbsite http://www.justiceisblind.info.
I was thrown here in jail illegally for not signing consent on my daughter’s passport application. I am planning to do a hunger strike in front of the U.S.Supreme Court. If any one want to join please contact me.

]]> http://ancpr.com/2008/03/10/new-formula-has-bitter-taste-for-mums-newscomau/#comment-6126 TracieFrendo@yahoo.com Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:27:57 +0000 http://ancpr.com/blog/2008/03/10/new-formula-has-bitter-taste-for-mums-newscomau/#comment-6126 I agree with these new laws. Unfortunately in some of these cases depedning on the total income, it can still leave fathers with a childsupport payment that can exceed percentages that can prevent them from being able to support themselves. Child support is for the children, not supporting the other parent. That would be alimony. The state of Georgia has had such a reform and those who fall in a lower income group may end up paying too much. Example: the formula claims that the cost of supporting two children of parents with a total combined income of $5000.00 monthly is 26% of their income where a couple with a total household income of 4 times that much is only 13% of their income. It is true that just because you make more doesn't mean some things cost more in regards to supporting a child, but for the lower income noncustodial parent this can leave them with an inability to provide a roof over their head. Also if a custodial parent makes a significant amount of money and the noncustodial parent doesn't, the overall percentage the noncutodial parent pays may be low, but it's a percentage of a large amount, there's where the problem occurs. There are some benefits to the new law like giving father's more time with their children but still doesn't protect all noncustodial parents, and there needs to be a federal formula making all states the same, excuted of course through the state courts. Also I feel if a noncustodial parent pays 50% plus of the child's care and they are in 100% compliance of that support they should at least be able to take turns claiming the children. I am told that federal law protects the custodial parent allowing them to claim the children. The only way to allow the noncutodial parent to claim the children is if the custodial parent files a form granting this, most women will not do that. The law does this figuring the custodial parent pays most of the costs for the children, and most is based on the time the children live with the custodial parent. There is still much more reform to be done to give father's a fair shake in the matter. I agree with these new laws. Unfortunately in some of these cases depedning on the total income, it can still leave fathers with a childsupport payment that can exceed percentages that can prevent them from being able to support themselves. Child support is for the children, not supporting the other parent. That would be alimony. The state of Georgia has had such a reform and those who fall in a lower income group may end up paying too much. Example: the formula claims that the cost of supporting two children of parents with a total combined income of $5000.00 monthly is 26% of their income where a couple with a total household income of 4 times that much is only 13% of their income. It is true that just because you make more doesn’t mean some things cost more in regards to supporting a child, but for the lower income noncustodial parent this can leave them with an inability to provide a roof over their head. Also if a custodial parent makes a significant amount of money and the noncustodial parent doesn’t, the overall percentage the noncutodial parent pays may be low, but it’s a percentage of a large amount, there’s where the problem occurs. There are some benefits to the new law like giving father’s more time with their children but still doesn’t protect all noncustodial parents, and there needs to be a federal formula making all states the same, excuted of course through the state courts. Also I feel if a noncustodial parent pays 50% plus of the child’s care and they are in 100% compliance of that support they should at least be able to take turns claiming the children. I am told that federal law protects the custodial parent allowing them to claim the children. The only way to allow the noncutodial parent to claim the children is if the custodial parent files a form granting this, most women will not do that. The law does this figuring the custodial parent pays most of the costs for the children, and most is based on the time the children live with the custodial parent. There is still much more reform to be done to give father’s a fair shake in the matter.

]]>