Truth be known, they should elimnate evaluators – ther Con Artist from day one.

Nila

Without specifically knowing Dr. Stahl’s background, the joke is that he thinks this law — if passed — would have any material impact on the assessment that county judges make on their little evaluation teams:
for God’s sakes, these people live together professionally. To expect any degree of objectivity — that would require the judge to go find additional outside information, and attempt to confirm the judgment of his evaluators — is completely ludicrous and ignorant.

Note that several paragraphs are given to the Cotton case: a serious percentage of fathers would love to have that kind of judge, one that would actually listen to the problems foisted upon the children by a mother.

I can’t even imagine any of the 7 judges I’ve faced having an iota of consideration along those lines. Their bias and ignorance were perfectly sufficient for their needs — and the continued abuse of my children…

Anderson and the CPPA are examples of support groups that do a great job of preventing any kind of moderated, mediated, compromised reality for our children: when it’s so easy to invoke VAWA, take 80% of the timeshare and its concomitant dollars, why in the dickens would any woman want to give an inch in favor of their children’s needs to be with their fathers?

So Dr. Baker and Ms. Johnstone see evidence that both parents exhibit significant amounts of alienating behavior: what a surprise… If anyone that mattered were to take standard negotiating practice into account, and evaluate this situation, the obvious evaluation of the available rewards to both parents to polarize children’s attitudes against the other parent leads to an obvious conclusion: we have a system designed to inflame, to perversely encourage one of the very outcomes we all rail against…

Stuck in a system that open declares no interest in due process, corroborating evidence, shared parenting as a good outcome, and amazingly biased evaluators willing to sentence mostly fathers to unlivable situations, why would anyone expect that the conversations with their children would not be Alienating?

The idea that judges are “cautious” about abuse charges is too kind: judges are predominantly politically correct cowards unwilling to go ask anyone to actually collect real facts — if they had any evaluators with those abilities…
They are rather willing to stumble ahead as if they actually do have the same level of information as their criminal and civil counterparts do for assessing status and providing due process — while openly denying the need for due process….

And, of course, the notion that the APA’s lack of endorsement for Gardner’s theories matters requires a simple reminder: these idiots came out with some significant support for an amazingly lame analysis indicating that Fathers were no longer necessary for the proper development of children…. So the lack of fathers as models and the 90% correlation to California inmate profiles doesn’t matter….? That’s right: we can put more of our black men in jail than any country in the world — largely due to the lack of adult, male role models behaving as good citizens…

I’m sure the CPPA has many good answers for all of this: I’m just hoping they get to be honest enough to consider the systemic abuses that their current positions engender and continue.