Alex S. Gabor
June 13, 2007
The poor poverty stricken man who is pursuing a $10 Billion Civil Suit against the State of Oregon, the Federal Government and 49 other States on behalf of himself as lead plaintiff and hundreds of thousands of fathers across the nation has given this author permission to publish his account of his current circumstances for the public record.
â€œOn May 13th, 2007 I got a letter from an attorney who I paid $100 to review my case. The first attorney who reviewed my case over the phone without any documentation also charged me $100. The first attorney referred me to the second attorney. The second attorney consulted with a third attorney more her superior and qualified to deal with my â€œcomplexâ€ case.
“The letter dated May 7th, 2007 included a copy of the original letter sent from the same attorney who had not responded since getting paid the $100 for more than a month.
The original letter was dated April 24th, my 51st birthday which I spent alone crying for several hours on the shores of the Pacific Ocean in Venice Beach because I have not been able to see my two minor children, age 5 and 11 for more than three years.â€
Originally the father had contacted the law firm just to get child visitation rights established by getting a court appointed attorney for the children who live in Eugene, Oregon.
The mother, over the past 13 years has had the man arrested on at least five occasions on false charges given to various local police, mostly after arguments about money and how to discipline the children.
Some of those charges included a felony which the father pled no contest to but which prevents the father from getting a job as a licensed real estate sales person in California, a profession in which he was successful prior to moving to California. A hearing with the State of California is set for August on that issue.
A no contest plea is treated the same as pleading guilty and usually avoids lengthy and costly trials, but leaves a permanent record on any mans life, barring him from many rights and opportunities, something which isnâ€™t always explained by lawyers and judges to those accused of things they didnâ€™t really do.
After much patient waiting by the father, the law firm finally wrote him a letter stating that in order for the law firm to represent him, he had to agree to authorize them to file a motion to appoint Robert Loveland or some other qualified psychologist to conduct a comprehensive custody evaluation for the purpose of generating a comprehensive custody and parenting time recommendation pertaining to the father, the mother and his two minor children,.
The letter stated that the law firm would prefer to use Dr Loveland who works out of Portland but provided no information about him, his practice or his qualifications. The letter went on to state that there are a few other qualified psychologists in Eugene who would also suffice. Their fees range from $4,000 to $6,000 and the father would need to pay that up front, directly to the psychologist.
It is a well documented fact that â€œthe psychiatric profession is made up of more quacks and idiots than all the mental institutions in the world combined, their pseudo science is full of jargon not even a rocket scientist could fathom, and psychology is nothing more than the brainwashing gibberish that lists more than ten thousand â€˜mental disordersâ€™ that only exist as ideaâ€™s and concepts in the minds of the people who invented them and who perpetually and ignorantly foist their pseudo knowledge and phony wisdom upon the unsuspecting victims erroneously seeking their helpâ€, at least according to the philosophy of Scientology â€“ â€œThe Science of Knowing How to Knowâ€.
Unfortunately, the mental health profession leaves much to be desired for society. If it really were a mental health profession, we would have no crime, no war and no insanity, or at least these things would be diminishing in the world rather than expanding.
Any human being who looks around at current planetary conditions could easily see from doing a tiny bit of research that the psychiatric profession has co-opted the legal and justice system in America.
Every lawyer and judge in America has been duped into believing that these â€œexpertsâ€ know something about how to improve the conditions of their patients. The exact opposite is true.
Just take a look at how much more profitable drug companies are today than they were thirty years ago. The greatest demand for prescription drugs comes from those written by psychiatrists. And psychiatrists are also the largest direct and indirect stockholders in publicly traded drug cartels.
Without justice, there can be no peace, without love, there can be no peace, without peace there can be no love, without love, there can be no justice, without justice, there can be no love, and there are no absolutes of these things, peace, love, justice, but they are interlocked into triangular degrees of sanity…for as one side of the triangle of peace, love and justice diminishes in power, capacity or application, the other two sides diminish correspondingly, and these three sides of the triangle are the building blocks of a sane civilization.
To the degree that peace, love and justice are blocked in any society, to that degree that society is insane, and there comes a point when insanity reaches a point where that society is doomed. Just ask any Roman, Greek or Babylonian…what went wrong?
The lawyer wrote that they would ask the Court to order the mother to pay some portion of the cost of the psychiatric evaluations, but that request would not be ruled on until the close of the case, so the father would need to front the money.
This case involves complicated histories on both parentsâ€™ parts of allegations of drug and alcohol abuse, alleged domestic violence, criminal allegations and convictions, all of them now expunged, etc.
The mental health, domestic violence and chemical dependency issues render this case complex and it would not serve the father or the children to go forward without the assistance of a mental health professional skilled and trained in custody evaluations, all according to the opinion of one attorney and her senior legal partner.
â€œIn general, it is a given understanding among the legal profession that these types of cases are dictated solely by â€˜the childrenâ€™s best interestsâ€™ but the complicated circumstances render it exceedingly difficult to flesh that outâ€, said the lawyer.
The law firm insists that the father resort to a custody evaluation conducted by a qualified mental health professional / custody evaluator. â€œThe ONLY issue before the court in a custody/parenting time case is â€˜what will serve the childrenâ€™s best interests?â€, according to the lawyer.
How many psychiatrists does it take to figure out what is in the best interests of a child and what say do the children have in the matter if they wish to see their father regardless of what their mother tells them about him?
According to research conducted online, Dr. Ira Daniel Turkat, PhD says that â€œDivorce related child visitation interference is a national problem, affecting six million children.
“Such interference may be acute or may represent chronic disorders, such as Parental Alienation Syndrome and Divorce Related Malicious Mother Syndrome. In certain cases, visitation interference is accompanied by vicious behaviors toward the noncustodial parent, including violence and violations of law.â€
It would appear that if the childrenâ€™s best interests were at the real core of all child visitation issues in the current legal system, there would not be six million children crying at night before bed time for their Daddyâ€™s, let alone the six million plus fathers who have been psychologically trained to â€œbite the bullet, be a man, hang tough, and be strongâ€, but who suffer great grief from their losses nevertheless, and are currently powerless to enforce their rights as fathers and men.
The psychologist would meet and observe the father, the mother, and the children, any other significant people in the childrenâ€™s lives, which in this case includes an alcoholic grandmother who is financially supporting the mother who is on welfare and who works for another law firm in Eugene.
The psychiatrist would have numerous interactions with the parties and the children; he would sift through and investigate all the allegations and circumstances. The father would need to fly up from Los Angeles to Eugene at least 3 times for that purpose.
That could prove difficult for a man who himself is now on food stamps, is collecting unemployment and is on the waiting list for surgery at UCLA Medical Center involving three hernias and other internal complications which have caused internal bleeding on and off for the past five years. The man is very close to being permanently disabled.
The lawyer went on to say they would file a motion to set a hearing to occur about 21 days from the date of filing to establish a temporary parenting time / access plan for the father and the children.
This would moist likely result in initial supervised parenting time for the father. In light of the history of this case, most critically the fact that the father has been out of the childrenâ€™s lives for so long, even assuming that it is on account of momâ€™s bad behavior, and the fact of alleged abuse, and the fact that the father has filed numerous, lengthy and somewhat renting pleadings on his own behalf in the State and Federal court system, the judgeâ€™s will be likely to err on the side of caution when it comes to assessing the fatherâ€™s emotional and mental stability.
This all according to the attorney who is too obviously also a woman.
In other words, if you file renting complaints using the Court system without an attorney your emotional and mental stability are in question? Could only a woman could come up with that kind of logic, or is this ingrained within the legal profession â€“ â€œif you need a lawyer you are mentally incompetentâ€.
â€œWhat the father and half the men in this country are not aware of is that if you hire an Esquire, a member of the BAR, you are basically stating and admitting to the court and the world that you are mentally incompetent and unable to represent yourself before society on the particular case in question, according to Master of Psychology drop out, Karl Chromy of Portland, Oregon. Chromy studied psychology for twelve years at Portland State University and never graduated.
After becoming a professional psychology student he eventually became permanently disabled after a hockey accident. Is there any connection between accidents and psychiatrists? Another story indeed!
In this instance, according to the attorney, parenting time would realistically need to begin on a supervised basis, but with the assistance of parenting time supervisors and several successful interactions between the father and his children, parenting time would likely expand, hopefully in fairly short order. Why does a father need supervised visits when the mother and grandmother kidnapped his children and havenâ€™t allowed them to see their father for over three years?
The lawyers say they know a good supervisor in Eugene and told the father he could fly up from Los Angeles twice a month or more to visit. There is only one crime in America. That crime is not having enough money to take care of your own personal business affairs and satisfy your personal needs.
Unfortunately the true criminals who create scarcity in this world â€“ the Bankers and the Lawyers â€“ are the ones in control of the global economy, so is it any wonder that well over $50 billion is now owed in back child support by more than a million hard working fathers from the 50 states? After all, 99.99% of Congress is composed of lawyers.
The lawyers said that â€œafter a few months, they would seek to release the supervision requirement and expand the visits. If you impress the evaluator, you could anticipate less frequent, but lengthy visits in California, to coincide with your kidsâ€™ academic breaksâ€.
So if all courts deal in the best interests of the child then why would anyone need to impress an evaluator? Why would the BAR be set so high that it excludes 95% of all hard working men from seeing their children by creating an invisible tax of unaffordable legal services?
The children always know the truth deep inside â€“ they already know who really loves them from a distance, like God might admire his children and let them make their own mistakes, and they also know who tortures them with daily doses of verbal abuse and lies. The dichotomy is real! It is mothers who raise most men in this country. The womenâ€™s movement has seemed to have forgotten that fact.
Unfortunately, according to Dr. Turkat â€œthe desire for ongoing and liberal visitation between child and nonresidential parent has frequently not kept pace with actual practices. The Children’s Rights Council (1994) estimates that six million children in the United States have their visitation interfered with by the custodial parents.
â€œTwo surveys support the range of this problem. Arditti (1992) reports that approximately 50% of divorced fathers relate that their ex-wife has interfered with visitation with their offspring. Similarly, approximately 40% of custodial mothers admit denying their ex-husband visitation in order to punish him (Kressel, 1985). In some cases, visitation interference has been associated with malicious unlawful acts against the father of such children (Turkat, in press). On rare occasions, a parent may actually kidnap the child.â€
Kidnapping is defined as when â€œA child was taken in violation of a custody agreement, court order or decree, the kidnapper failed to return a child at the end of a legal or agreed-upon visit, with the child being away at least overnight. An attempt was made to conceal the taking, or the whereabouts of a child, or to prevent contact with the child. The child is transported out of state, or there is evidence that the abductor had the intent to keep the child indefinitely, or to permanently alter custodial privileges,â€ according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
In this particular case the woman took the children from Reno without the fatherâ€™s knowledge after the woman found out through confidential emails with business associates that the father intended to divorce the mother and give her $2.4 million as a settlement of their marriage thereafter.
Where that money was to come from is a whole different story, perhaps even a book or a movie. It took the father three months to find the children living with the childrenâ€™s grandmother in Eugene, Oregon. The woman abandoned the home in Reno.
In 2008, there will be an estimated 5 million divorces, affecting more than 5 million children. Out of those families that are being broken up by a financial, economic and legal system that destroys incentive and continues to ship jobs overseas, while the cost of gas skyrockets at home, on any given day, at least 1,000 children will be taken away from the other parent without their knowledge and kidnapped away according to the National Crime Information Center.
There are more than 40 million children in America today, living with a single parent who is separated, or divorced. In 2008 there may be more than 2 million additional new divorces as millions of families lose their homes to foreclosures from the housing depression that is well underway and could last another decade.
150,000 divorces a year, or 1 in 7 involve child custody battles. Todayâ€™s average marriage will last about five years. Single-parent families have increased by over 1000% since 1960 as have divorces.
Not politics, law nor religion have provided an effective antidote to this spreading social disease.
The lawyers told the father that he would need to deposit $2,500 into their client trust account. Can anyone really trust bankers and lawyers these days?
â€œIn light of our review of your financial history and circumstances, we are not willing to proceed with less than that up front. With a custody evaluator on board, however, that really minimizes, potentially, the amount of work that the attorneys have to do. At any time that your trust account balance fell below $1,200, you would need to deposit an additional $500 within one week of being so notified,â€ wrote the lawyer to the poor father.
There is only one thing worse than being insane. That is â€œnot knowingâ€ that you are insane. The court system that the legal profession has dreamed up and foisted upon the fathers of America is insane and they do not know it, but fathers all over the country do and they will eventually do away with the entire lot in the process of seeking justice.
As a homeless man once wrote in a poem written for a song for a soundtrack of a yet to be finished major screen play, â€œThe Bankers and the Lawyers they all fall downâ€.
A group of people in California known as Fathers for Justice are now in discussions to form a legal offense fund to change the laws and mandate equally shared parenting time, regardless of the circumstances surrounding disputes among couples and their legal separation issues. Their recent support of Alec Baldwin at a rally for fatherâ€™s rights was very well publicized elsewhere.
Another group out of Indiana is moving forward with their class action lawsuits in each state of the union. To demonstrate how insane lawyers and politicians have become, the following story should give the reader a tiny peek into absurdity.
According to Glenn Sacks, â€œIt would be difficult to make California’s controversial domestic violence policies more irrational and unfair to men, but Senator Sheila Kuehl (D–Santa Monica) is trying.
â€œCalifornia law has long excluded men and their children from receiving state-funded DV services, even though research demonstrates that a third of domestic violence-related injuries are incurred by heterosexual males caused by women.
â€œThe legislature reiterated this exclusion last fall by passing AB 2051, which references services for â€˜battered womenâ€™ 31 times yet never once mentions “male victims,” “men,” or even simply â€˜victims.â€™
While California funds over 100 domestic violence shelters for women, there are only two facilities in the state which even accept male victims, and both of them are in remote areas.
Recently Kuehl and the California Senate Judiciary Committee took the state’s DV policies to a new level of absurdity by passing a law to address the issue of domestic violence and…Pets!
Kuehl’s SB 353 amends Section 6320 of the Family Code so that women claiming domestic abuse can more easily gain custody of the family’s pets. The bill also allows women to obtain restraining orders which prevent alleged abusers from having contact with their pets.
While legislators focus on protecting dogs, cats, rabbits and hamsters from being exposed to domestic violence, they’ve failed to offer any services to men, and still the childrenâ€™s longsuffering weeps, deep into the night, asking, where is my Daddy?
Isnâ€™t it amazing that intelligent people practicing law cannot come up with simpler solutions that are really in the best interests of their potential clientsâ€™ children? Is there anything more important to the future survival of the human race than our children?
Has the United States Government, the State of Oregon and many of their attorneyâ€™s, employees and agents also become unwitting accomplices in what appears to be a developing story of kidnapping?
This is the third article written by Alex S. Gabor on the subject of individual fatherâ€™s rights versus the State and Federal Government. A book, â€œDomestic Family Terrorismâ€ by the same author is in the works, seeking a publisher.
Powered by Facebook Comments