Idea: Blog candidates on Father’
February 21, 2007
|
Posted by ANCPR
Comments
Powered by Facebook Comments
Categories: News
|
Leave a reply
February 21, 2007
|
Posted by ANCPR
6 Comments
-
fastscott says:
Well from the lack of posts here I can see that there has not been much interests from this forum on this idea.
I did my blogging on thursday. And evidently I did get a response from newt.org. They have blocked me from participation in their forums. I emailed them a response and a copy of it follows:I have been contributing to your forums and I tried to contribute tonight but it now seems that you are now blocking me from participating. I cannot understand why. I have used no fowl language. I have just asked what Mr. Gingrich’s stance is on reform of the family court system and the long promised reform or repeal of USC 42/7/IV-D/666. Have I asked something that is VERBOTIN? Is this such a hot subject that you do not want it touched. This issue affects over 25 million Americans and more children. I cannot for the life of me understand why you would want to restrict discussion on this issue. Is this what we can expect from Newt.org and the winning for the future Campaign? If it is, you are going to alienate a large block of voters and whomever picks up the flag on this issue will get that large block of voters. I would appreciate an answer by return email. If I do not get a response I will assume that you have no interests in this issue and that I can broadcast that fact over the internet.
I await your response.
Scott McCulloch -
Jim Deeny says:
Scott-
I’ll send out something also via email to Newt.Org. That’s just crazy that you’d be blocked on a blog no less.
-
Kevin Merck says:
Scott:
If Scott McCulloch is your real name, thanks for making that public. I don’t personally know anyone who would read anything “fastscott†had to say, but they would listen to and possibly learn from, what Scott McCulloch had to contribute. Stephen Baskerville quoted this guy not long ago in one of his articles and it makes a lot of sense:
“A single, seemingly powerless person who dares to cry out the word of truth and to stand behind it with all his person and all his life, ready to pay a high price, has, surprisingly, greater power, though formally disfranchised, than do thousands of anonymous voters.â€
– Vaclav Havel
Not very many people will listen to someone who hides behind an alias. Everyone who claims to support father’s rights, yet hides behind an alias, is doing us a huge disservice. On the other hand, anyone with the courage to look death in the face and not flinch has enormous power. No one should be afraid, or ashamed, of having been the victim of criminals and gendercidal maniacs. They count on fear to keep us anonymous, faceless victims of their murderous criminal activity.
On the subject of blogging:
The people who make politics their life, believe it or not, aren’t stupid. They continually survey the political landscape for possible voter windfalls. There is no serious perceived threat by not supporting – or payoff – associated with supporting father’s rights. Fathers and men in general, are less popular than Jews were in prewar Germany. There is very little leadership, and what little there is, hasn’t the conviction to take the appropriate steps to organize. They seem to be paralyzed with fear, much like a herd of sheep, (or Jews) that’s being loaded onto boxcars for their “final destinationâ€.
I think much of the attitude portrayed by some of the so-called leadership is a reflection of the 50% female “supportersâ€. Allowing women undue influence is arguably what got us into this mess to begin with. We “are not†going to bring an end to this crisis by writing to politicians about the corruption. We have to run their sorry-asses out of office. Many of our female supporters see this as a case of well-meaning judges and politicians who’ve not yet realized their terrible mistakes, and that assertion is unadulterated bullshit. These bureaucrats know exactly what they are doing, and just like any pathological criminal who’s in it for the money, they could care less.
“Femocrats†are not going to support us. Supporting us would undermine their efforts of the last hundred years. They would be cutting their own throats. Any show of support from them would be an effort to hoodwink us; promise reform, and deliver a jail cell.
Republicans may show an interest if we can demonstrate the ability to start organizing the victims. If they see the potential, they will invest the time, effort and money it will take to organize millions of non-custodial parents to vote. They have their backs against the wall over the war in Iraq, due to the unrelenting Feminist/Leftist media bombardment of the public, with the “all bad†news about the war. Femocrats have used the war, (that they all voted for) to regain the House and Senate, and they fully intend to ride the wave of public sentiment to get out of Iraq, all the way to the Whitehouse.
Unfortunately, by the time the Republicans realize that non-custodial parents are their only salvation, (doing the right thing usually is) it may be too late to organize the voters. Non-custodial parents will have wasted the precious little time we have, in futile efforts to win the hearts and minds of these loathsome criminals, by writing letters and emails to the very people responsible for this disaster.
The only thing that makes sense to me for the immediate future, the “here and nowâ€, is to reach out to the victims, and our “leadershipâ€, to change course while there’s still time before the election. We shouldn’t be wasting our time with people like Hillary Clinton, or Newt Gingrich; they’re the last people we should be worrying about. If you want to do some “constructive bloggingâ€, direct it toward the victims of this crisis. Urge them to register to vote and to stop cooperating with their own destruction.
Stephen Baskerville announced in a recent ACFC newsletter that we were “over the humpâ€. He had the attention of three Republican Senators who wanted to show us support. One of them is now running for president. They told him to “show some leadershipâ€. They were telling him to organize our ranks and supporters to vote. So what’s up? Are we “over the humpâ€- or – “flat on our faceâ€? What’s it going to take to get the message across?
Again, here is a link, to a way to reach out to potential supporters. Forget about whose idea it was. This is a way to contact the victims of this racket. You don’t have to go door to door, or call millions of people, just get the information. If we get the support of a major contender for the Whitehouse, we will have the “necessary†contact information. If it turns out we don’t need the information, because of a lack of support, then what have you lost. At worst, you would be out the cost of postage. Also, if you got a list of contacts from welfare and were able to influence just a couple of people who are victims, in my opinion, that’s worth a million emails to the likes of Newt Gingrich.
http://www.indianacrc.org/FOIA.html
If anyone has any constructive feedback as to why this isn’t a good idea, I’d like to hear it.
Thanks for your time.
Kevin Merck
-
Kevin,
I sent an email to newt.org-I am now able to blog again on the site.
as far as your idea-it has merit. The problem is it is very time consumming and gets very little return. For some reason it just does not seem that men can organmize like the women did.
Kevin, you are always preaching to the choir here. Thats O.K., but what is needed is to get the discussion to the parishioners-the people out there that do not know there is a problem or issue until it happens to them.So, I will continue to talk and blog to the congregation as I know the choir (NCP’s) KNOW what the issue is. I can always use your help on this.
Scott
-
Mr. McCulloch:
I’m not saying don’t blog Newt Gingrich, or any of the other potential candidates, it’s a good idea. It’s not likely to have any impact because we are not an organized political force. I sent out an email today to McCain, Brownback, Romney and Gingrich. It will be interesting to see if I get any response.
I probably do sound like a preacher; it’s a very “emotional issue†for me. I feel like we are all having our freedom taken from us and the best anyone can think to do is write emails to their congressmen. It’s extremely frustrating for me, because it’s painfully clear to me that the best way, short of massive civil disobedience, to gain anyone’s attention, is to muster the voters for a political solution. Women didn’t organize by writing letters to politicians, they voted their “sorry-assess†out of office.
I don’t buy the argument that men are unable to organize the way women have. I think women love to hear people say that, but it isn’t true. I think people who really believe that, have either been brainwashed by feminists, or are feminists. It reminds me of the statement you made that men are not entitled to have an equal role in their child’s life because it wasn’t spelled out verbatim in the Bill of Rights. That is precisely why many of the Founders didn’t want a Bill of Rights, because they were concerned that any inherent rights that weren’t painstakingly spelled out would eventually be lost.
There needs to be a way for us to reach the victims of this racket in order to organize them. Very few of us are taking to the internet; there needs to be another way. If anyone can come up with a better idea than the FOIA, they should share it.
This is the email I sent out to the candidates. I’ll post any response.
Dear _________
Thanks for the service you’ve given our country.
So much of the nation’s focus is on the war, and it’s doing severe damage to our country. Democrats have used the war, to regain the House and Senate, and fully intend to ride the wave of public sentiment to get out of Iraq, all the way to the Whitehouse.
I’d like to know what you intend to do in order to stem this tide. There are situations here at home resulting in the loss of life that would make the sacrifices in Iraq look pale and insignificant in comparison. Those are undoubtedly bold words, which might easily be taken out of context, but true nonetheless.
I encourage you to read the book just released, Friend of the Court – Enemy of the Family, authored by Carol Rhodes, a 30 year veteran of our child support enforcement industry. I’m certain you will be shocked and dismayed that this could be taking place in our own country, at the cost of countless American lives, and a fortune in American treasure.
Sincerely,
Kevin Merck
-
Maybe what the country needs is to get in touch with our roots. There isn’t very much I disagree with in this platform. I thought the Constitution Party was like the “Libertarian Partyâ€, which is why I’ve never checked it out. The “Libertarian†position on abortion and immigration are unacceptable to most Americans. The “Constitution Party Platform†is what our country was meant to be. I guess if people can’t live with that, maybe they should look for a new country to call home. Anyone who doesn’t want to uphold the Constitution should not be able to enjoy any of the benefits.
I think we need to run these “Femocrats†right out of this country. Let them perform their abortions, in a country of single female households, that lay around on welfare, and don’t allow their citizens to own guns. They won’t be too hard to find.
Kevin Merck
http://www.constitutionparty.com/
fastscott said,
on February 20th, 2007 at 6:59 pm
I am just putting this out there for you to consider.
I have been blogging on candidates sites. The problem is that these blogs do not get much notice because everyone is consumed in the Iraq war and the thread gets lost in that discussion.
This week I am targeting Newt Gingrich.
Thursday evening 2/22/07 at 8 P.M. mountain time is my target time.
Go to newt.org and register for the blog. Do this before 8 so you can get registered. Do not be a bystander. Your participation is needed. Registering is free.
The purpose of the blog is to find out what his stance is on reform of the family court system and the long overdue promise of reform of USC 42/7/IV-D/666. Blog your concerns. We may get some notice. Reform of the family court system is just not an issue in your state. National reform will help in your states reform. National attention will get your states attention.
I am not a Gingrich supporter-I support no candidate at this time.
The purpose is to try and get the issue to the forefront. This week it is Gingrich-next week it will be another candidate. We need to get this into the national dialogue. It needs to be addressed as one of the top domestic issues for the next national election. It is at the heart of “family values†and family survival.
Thank you
Scott
P.S. go ahead and copy this and post to any other sites you visit