PBS Whitewashes Flawed Documentary
Received this from RADAR (contact info below):
RADAR ALERT:
PBS Whitewashes Flawed Documentary
After a month-long review, the Public Broadcasting Service has disappointed thousands of viewers and given its stamp of approval to Breaking the Silence: Children’s Stories.
According to the PBS statement, “The producers approached the topic with the open mindedness and commitment to fairness that we require of our journalists. Their research was extensive and supports the conclusions drawn in the program.†The entire PBS statement is shown at the end of this Alert.
PBS plans to produce a follow-up documentary on child custody, family courts, and parental alienation syndrome, to be aired in Spring 2006. PBS does not indicate that the second program will highlight the concerns or perspectives of fathers; indeed, the PBS statement does not even include the word, “father.â€
Of greater concern is the PBS statement that says, “Additionally, the documentary’s ‘first-person story telling approach’ did not allow the depth of the producers’ research to be as evident to the viewer as it could have been.†[emphasis added]. RADAR is concerned that in Breaking the Silence Part II, PBS will simply present biased experts and one-sided research that will reinforce the propaganda-like conclusions contained in Breaking the Silence Part I.
The PBS statement made no concession to Ken Bode, ombudsman for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, who wrote on Monday, “It was precisely the lack of balance and fairness that caused so many viewers to contact PBS and CPB … Lasseur now says that [lack of balance] was intentional. Simply put, that amounts to a plea of guilty to violating the fairness and balance standards of PBS.†[http://www.cpb.org/ombudsmen/051219bode.html]
The PBS statement also ignored the criticisms by PBS’ own ombudsman, Michael Getler, who wrote on December 2 that the program comes across “as a one-sided, advocacy program†and “there was no recognition of opposing views.â€
[http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/2005/12/introduction_and_breaking_the_silence.html]
On December 12, RADAR sent a letter to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting calling for an Inspector General investigation of the program. The letter reiterated RADAR’s demands that PBS completely retract Breaking the Silence, and that PBS commission a follow-up documentary that highlights the plight of children endangered by a court system that awards custody to fathers only 15% of the time. [http://www.mediaradar.org/docs/RADAR_letterToCPB_InspectorGeneral.pdf]
A recent column by David Usher reveals how Breaking the Silence is part of a broader campaign to influence public policy that would make it far more difficult for divorcing fathers to gain shared parenting rights of their children.
[http://www.therealitycheck.org/GuestColumnist/dusher121905.htm]
RADAR will analyze the situation over the upcoming holidays and issue our next Alert on January 2, 2006.
——————————————————————————–
PBS Programming Statement on BREAKING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S STORIES
BREAKING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN’S STORIES chronicles the impact of domestic violence on children and the recurring failings of family courts across the country to protect them from their abusers. In stark and often poignant interviews, children and battered mothers tell their stories of abuse at home and continued trauma within the courts. The producers approached the topic with the open mindedness and commitment to fairness that we require of our journalists. Their research was extensive and supports the conclusions drawn in the program. Funding from the Mary Kay Ash Charitable Foundation met PBS’s underwriting guidelines; the Foundation had no editorial influence on program content.
However, the program would have benefited from more in-depth treatment of the complex issues surrounding child custody and the role of family courts and most specifically the provocative topic of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS). Additionally, the documentary’s “first-person story telling approach” did not allow the depth of the producers’ research to be as evident to the viewer as it could have been.
PBS has received a substantial body of analysis and documentation from both supporters of the documentary and its critics.
It is clear to us that this complex and important issue would benefit from further examination. To that end, PBS will commission an hour-long documentary for that purpose. Plans call for the documentary to be produced and broadcast in Spring 2006. We expect that the hour-long treatment of the subject will allow ample opportunity for doctors, psychologists, judges, parent advocates and victims of abuse to have their perspectives shared, challenged and debated.
——————————————————————————–
Date of RADAR Release: December 20, 2005
R.A.D.A.R. – Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting – is a network of concerned men and women working to assure that the problem of domestic violence is treated in a balanced and effective manner: http://www.mediaradar.org.
Comments
Powered by Facebook Comments

December 21, 2005
|
Posted by ANCPR
Categories:
im not surprised by this at all …
Booooooooo!!!
Let’s make our own then on women who abuse, kill their children, and alienate them from fathers!
And stick this feather in our hat!
pbs is so filthy.
Join me in calling and writing and begging your senators and representatives and telling them to end pbs funding (and funding for npr, too).
Crap. TBN gets along just fine without federal funding – and I watch TBN all the time – I can no longer take tha father bashing on network TV.
Post a end pbs funding sign in your yard.
Tell everybody you see that pbs needs to be kicked off the public dole.
And vote for the Libertarian or Constitution party man of your choice so we can begin to make a difference.
Before I was an avid “Fathers Rights” type of person I would watch TV and pay no mind to certain things. I see the commercials, some movies, news and such that totally bash the males today. It’s like a whole new world once I’ve educated myself on my surroundings.
Writing letters and sending emails to the media, congressmen and senators is the equivalent of hitting the enemy with spitballs.
If we want to make a difference in real time, we need to hit them with a laser guided bunker buster, which is exactly the effect we will achieve by refusing to pay the extortion.
Merry Christmas
It’s all good. The female chauvinist pigs we are dealing with have had carte blanche to do as they please for the last thirty to forty years or more. We can’t expect to change things overnight.
Of course, refusing to pay the extortion would be the quickest way to victory, but that may not happen anytime soon.
So get use to the idea of a tedious, protracted, hard-fought war of the trenches, which will grind on for years and years at tremendous cost of life, liberty and happiness.
Merry Christmas
Said another way:
If for some good reason we are not able to stop paying the extortion that enables the kidnapping of millions of children from their fathers, (in some cases mothers) then we should be dangling off a bridge somewhere in a batman suit or organizing websites like this one to give people a chance to speak out.
Of course the most effective way is going to be to stop paying the extortion. Merely writing or emailing the media, congressmen, and senators etc. is not very effective. It could be compared to hitting an enemy with spitballs. It is very easy for these people to politely tell you to take a number. On the other hand, refusing to pay the extortion, (which is no more illegal than Rosa Parks taking a seat at the front of the bus) is the equivalent of hitting an enemy with a laser guided-bunker buster. The effects are in real time and it hits them right where they live. Without the money generated by the collection of the extortion, they cannot charge the taxpayer for collecting. This will have a dramatic and immediate effect on the whole extortion racket. It will draw gradual media attention and eventually undermine the efforts of these criminals, because their crimes will be exposed to the American People.
We may then begin the healing process by prosecuting the people who have so blatantly violated the constitutional rights of millions of Americans under the nauseating pretense of “the best interests of childrenâ€.
Merry Christmas
You too Kev!